Love Song

Love is in the air.  Valentine's Day is only a heartbeat away.  Which is about the time I'll be able to tell you what this project is.  But not now, sadly.  For the time being, it's just the yarn and me, sharing some very special and romantic moments.  Even though our love is secret, I just can't resist shouting it from the rooftops:  I LOVE LOVE LOVE this yarn:

I can tell you that it's plump, luscious and juicy.  It's got 32, count em, 32 plies of lustrous wooly goodness.  I'm using US 10.5 needles, which for me might as well be telephone poles.  My fingers called to let me know they appreciate the change from the skinny little frog fuzz yarn I've been knitting with lately.  

No lightweights here.  This yarn's got back.  Got some junk in its trunk.  Just more of it to love, baby.  Being well-upholstered is nothing to be ashamed of, when you wear it like this skein.  Dead Sexy yarn.

If loving it is wrong, I don't want to be right.

Oh, and if you guess what this yarn is, I still can't tell you until the pattern is published next month, but you will have my undying respect.

The First Step Is Admitting You are Powerless Over Math

I am a creature of absolutes.  Black or white.  Win or lose.  Pick a side: We're at war.  I rarely dwell in the space between - it makes me twitchy.  Er.    So you would think that the very nature of Mathematics would appeal to me.  It's incontrovertible.  The numbers either add up, or they don't, and it's possible (or so I'm led to understand) to dissect a math problem to the very juncture at which its legs fell off.  You can know, with precision, exactly the point at which you went astray.  Or so I'm told.

Couldn't prove it by me. 

Every once in a while, I begin a project with MUCH more confidence than my math skills should warrant.  Not often, but from time to time, I hear myself thinking things like "...and I'll figure out the math part later...".  These are the sorts of thoughts which cause Tech Editors to come to your house in the night.  And I don't mean to have tea, either.

In spite of my fervent desire to begin 2011 on a note of success, I have instead spent the last 5 days knitting and reknitting the same stoopid stinking sweater back.  I blame myself, of course.  It's only because I elected to think.

Usually I work by figuring out one thing at a time.  What is the gauge?  Knit a swatch.  How many stitches and rows are in an inch?  How many inches of knitting do I think would look nice around the body?  Whose body is it?  And so on, until sometime near the end of the project when minutiae start to occur to me, such as Will there be enough yarn?

Well this time, in what can only be described as a fit of overconfidence, I decided to use this "simple" pattern as a test case for working out the entire pattern ahead of time, and then knitting it.  I would painstakingly sketch, schematic, count and cogitate, until all the numbers for all the sizes were completely worked out, and then knitting the sample would be just like using somebody else's pattern!  What fun!

Until the part where the knitting I was doing turned out to have been based on basic arithmetic done by ME.  So preoccupied was I, after failing to produce the anticipated number of stitches for the third time, that I failed to notice that the sweater back could not be worn by any human.  Not one with appendages in the places where I keep mine, anyhow.

But I'm not letting it get me down.  No, Siree.  I'm just telling myself that I've cleverly gotten my Epic Math Bloodbath out of the way early this year.  That's right.  No more second-guessing my own hard-earned processes.  Not for me.  I'm the big loud-y always telling everybody that a knitter's OWN way is the best one for them, and nobody should try to squeeze themselves into someone else's knitting mold, after all.  From now on I'm gonna listen to my own loud advice. 

Unless the advice is to try using math for something that sheer force of will can achieve.
 

Gesundheit

You might remember that when I started this vest, I didn't even really want to make it.  I wasn't so much interested in the project as I was compelled.  I just couldn't get the idea of it out of my head. 

And so once I let go the question of whether or not I was going to make the thing, it pretty much leapt, fully formed, out of my head.  Not unlike sneezing.  You know it's coming, and there's not a darn thing to be done about it, except possibly to protect innocent bystanders by adjusting your aim.

My mother always told me and my sisters when we were growing up that we should avoid horizontal stripes because they are unflattering and make you look wide in all the wrong places.  Sorry, Mom, but I think I may have proven that theory wrong.

I love it when people say that stranded colorwork garments are unflattering because they are nothing but straight lines, with no shaping.  To those uninitiated, I offer the Violet Vest: Steek-A-Palooza.

And as for the style, I'd say it's somewhere between Bea-Arthur-As-Maude, and Bohemian Dirndl.  Stripes are not usually the first design element I think of, but I really dig the way they highlight the shaping, by bending around it.  I also love the peasanty bust gathers above the waist detail; very comfortable to wear.  

So now that I have that out of my system, I'll be returning to the Weasley jumpers, the second sock, and possibly some more Japanese oak leaves.  Just gotta locate the tissues first.