Cut Your Knitting: Part I, Sweater Math

So you've finished your Permission Denied body tube. Congratulations! That went really fast, didn't it? I'm always amazed how fast and easy it is to knit stranded colorwork sweaters, once the groundwork of gauge, motifs and charts has been accomplished. Now what? Before we cut, a bit of prep work will get us ready to hack into our knitting with confidence. Job One: Math. With all the body tube sts still live on my needle, I BO the center front steek sts. Then I break the working strand(s), and set it aside while I do the following:

First I draw an oval shape in my knitting notebook. This represents the top of my body tube, if I were looking down on it from above. In the center of the oval, I write the original number of body sts from my cast on, exclusive of the steek sts (243, for my sweater). At the bottom of the oval, I draw a little space that represents the bound off steek sts. Since they are bound off, they are not part of any of this math; it's just a visual representation.

Math1.JPG

Next, I draw the location of my armhole steeks. Since there are no special waste sts cast on for these, they are just regular old live sts located at the sides of my body tube. I usually designate 6 sts for each of the armholes, but I found out I could match the pattern perfectly at its shoulder seam if I only used 5 sts for each armhole. Thanks, Knitting!

Now I visually divide the body tube into sixths. On the back half of the sweater, there are 3 groups of sts, roughly 1/3 of the back, each. On the front half, there are 4 groups; 2 for the shoulder fronts, roughly 1/3 of the front each, and 2 little groups, one on each side of the center front which add up to the last 1/3 of the front. These  groups of sts will become my shoulder fronts and backs, and my neckline front and back. 

I label each of my 7 stitch groups with their approximate fraction of the whole body tube, minus the armhole steeks.

Now I can haul out my calculator and find out how many stitches are in each of these groups.

First I subtract the stitches I know I'll need to use for the armhole steeks (243 - 10 = 233). Then I divide by 6 (233/6 = 38.666). Now I can round each group up or down to get whole numbers of stitches. The 4 shoulder groups (Right Front, Right Back, Left Back & Left Front) all have to be equal, so that's easy. I'll give them 38 sts each. I'll round up 1 st for the center back group because I started with an uneven number, which gives me 39 sts for the back neckline. Then I'll use the remaining 42 sts in my round for the front neckline, placing half on each side of the center front steek. This means that the center front neckline is 3 sts wider than the center back neckline. I could move everything around to make my groups more equal, but then my motifs won't match up at the shoulder seam. 3 sts is an acceptable margin of difference, in my experience, so I'll roll with it to make my motifs match at the shoulder joins. Then I check my math by adding all the stitch groups back together: 21 + 38 + 5 +38 + 39 + 38 + 5 + 38 + 21 = 243. Yay!

Now all I do is thread a tapestry needle with some smooth waste yarn and place each group of stitches on its own separate holder. When I come to the armhole stitches, I bind them off by looping one over the next with a crochet hook. Here's my actual sweater, with its live stitch groups held by waste yarn:

Click to enlarge

As you can see, in this photo I've already cut my center front open. Wait until part 2 for that, please. I still have a couple of things to show you before you actually cut. Stay Tuned!

Command Decisions

Recognize this schematic? I mean before someone circled-and-slashed it?

This is the schematic of the proposed garment shape for Roan's Roan pattern. The reason *someone* has defaced it is that it is hateful to human bodies, and therefore to knitters. THERE IS NO PLACE TO PUT THE WEARER'S NECK. Placing a "garment" of this shape onto a human body will result in (at least) two problems:

1. The pointy shape at the top of the center back will squish down, forming a hump of knitted fabric. Instant Hunchback. We can't see this (or the un-centered chart motifs) because no photos of the back are shown to us. But it's there, my friends, O it is there.

2. The front edges, with no other choice (Science!), will hitch up around the wearer's neck, causing them to shorten in front at the bottom hem. 

I'm choosing to believe that the original silhouette was a misguided attempt to make things easier for the knitters. Unfortunately, it only makes things ill-fitting.

Luckily for us, the fix is pretty simple. Now that we are knitting our stranded colorwork in the round, as God intended, all we have to do is have a little think on necklines. There's plenty of time to do this as we blissfully work along on our sweater body tubes.

Here are a few neckline shapes for us to think about, and how to make them:

Copywright Mary Scott Huff, 2017, All Rights Reserved

All of these options are created after all the body tube knitting is complete. We just remove any knitted fabric that would get in the way of our having necks.

Copywright Mary Scott Huff, 2017, All Rights Reserved

These two options call for a little action as we knit. #4 is done when the body tube is complete up to the base of the square neckline. When the second "mini" steek is cut, the neckline forms a square. #5 is done at whatever point in the knitting you feel like it, and calls for mirrored decreases at regular intervals next to the steek. When the steek is cut, the neckline forms a V.

Both of these options call for the knitter to make a command decision on where the shaping will commence, which is why I mention them to you now, while there's still plenty of time for (most of) you to implement them.

For my Permission Denied sweater, I am going with the tried-and-true neckline #1. I like it because it requires no thought while knitting the body tube, and can be placed with exact precision when I'm ready. How about you, Gentle Readers?

Comment below, or weigh in at the Ravelry Knitalong group and show us! 

The Long and Short of it

If you're knitting along with me on the Permission Denied project, you might be wondering some things at this point in the process, namely, When will I be done with the body tube?

That's what I'm starting to think about, anyway. Here's where I am in the knitting today. The body measures about 17 1/2" long. I'd like to get in three repeats of the knots band, which I think is a nice proportion. It visually divides the body into about 2/3 knots and 1/3 birds-n-vines. What I have here is about half and half, which is less pleasing to my eye.

If I work another set of repeats from here (one more knot band and 2 more flower bands flanking it), I'll have a body tube of roughly 23 1/4" long, not counting a lower edge treatment. 

Using the extremely precise method of holding the end of a measuring tape up to my shoulder seam at the 24" mark and seeing where the end lands on my body, I have determined that this will be a little longer than I'd like. I usually prefer my sweaters to land at the top of my hipbone, which is only about 21". However, with so much dramatic pattern, it's going to be extremely obvious/ugly if I end this in the wrong place at the shoulder. So much so that I'm willing to sacrifice the sweater's ideal overall length in order to get it right. 

If I were really hyper about the length, I could forego the upper flower band, shortening the sweater by 1 1/2". But I think the symmetry created by "bracketing" the knots bands with flower bands is more important to me than how long it turns out.

The original version of this calls for shaping that creates a slope at the shoulder. I think that's kind of odd for a Kimono, but then, this whole design is odd, so there you have it. I haven't decided whether or not to slope my shoulders, but here are my thoughts on it so far:

There are two ways to create a shoulder slope: 1. Work back and forth, binding off a few stitches with each pass, creating a stair-step edge. 2. Work back and forth using short rows to create a smooth slope. Both options are decidedly fiddly (miserable?) in stranded colorwork. The pattern is going to get interrupted in all sorts of yucky ways, which will require talent and skill in the planning and execution. And you know how I feel about skill and talent (okay for some knitters, but I prefer Sexy Party Tricks).

Now, if I had created armholes for set-in sleeves, there would be no question that I'd need to shape the shoulders. Those things just go together. But since I haven't, I could easily get away with straight shoulder seams. And if I were making shaped sleeve caps for set-in armholes, then I'd definitely need to slope the shoulders. Again, I'm not doing that, so why make it harder for myself? But while I ponder these what-ifs, I know some of you may want sloped shoulders, so here are the questions I'd ask you:

What pattern will you use in the area of the shaping? Will it land right in the middle of a knot border? Can you get away with a solid patch of MC and no pattern at the shoulder? Would you like to chart a new (easier to work flat) motif to put up there? How will that 6th motif look/work with the previous 5? Is this so complicated you'll skip it altogether?

No need to panic: we all still have lots of time left to decide, while knitting to the desired body length. What would you do/are you doing for your own Permission Denied length and shoulders?